This group often appeals to blatant circular reasoning when debating other translations. White explains, “They believe God ‘re-inspired’ the Bible in 1611.” Often, they argue that God waited for the English language to develop properly until it was solidified in the 17 th century, and he re-inspired the Bible at this time. This group-certainly the most extreme of all views-holds that the KJV is actually a new revelation from God himself. White writes, “Most King James Only advocates would fall into this group.” Advocates of this group would include Peter Ruckman, Samuel Gipp, Gail Riplinger, and D. Group #4: “The Inspired KJV Group.”Īccording to this group, the KJV and the Textus Receptus are both inspired and without error. According to this group, Erasmus’ Textus Receptus (or “Received Text”) was sovereignly preserved or even inspired. None of his manuscripts was earlier than the twelfth century.” His publication served as the foundational text for the KJV in 1611. Carson writes, “Erasmus utilized several Greek manuscripts, not one of which contained the entire New Testament. To construct his translation, Erasmus had only 6 manuscripts at his disposal from the Byzantine text family (see below for an explanation of the textual families). John Wycliffe translated the first English Bible from the Latin Vulgate in the 14 th century, but it was Erasmus who published the first Greek Bible in 1516, which is called the Textus Receptus. However, this is a question of intellectual debate. White explains, “These individuals would not necessarily believe that those texts themselves are inspired, per se, but that they more accurately reflect the original writings of the prophets or the apostles.” We believe this group is in error (as we’ll see), but they are not militant in any way-merely misguided. This group believes that the KJV was translated from the most faithful Greek manuscripts (e.g. Scholars Zane Hodges and Arthur Farstad fall under this category. While we might debate the legitimacy of the KJV, there is really no significant problem if someone prefers to read this translation. There is really no problem with someone holding to this view. Many Christians grew up reading the KJV, and they enjoy the way it reads. If someone subjectively prefers the KJV, this is their prerogative. There is really no problem with this first group. Expert James White distinguishes five separate categories of KJV Only views: Group #1: “I Like the KJV Best.” Is the King James Version (KJV) the only version that Christians should read today? Many Christians claim that it is, and it casts doubt on other believers who use more modern translations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |